May 08, 2003

10:41 AM

   HOME

   MEETINGS & EVENTS    BY LAWS    HISTORY
   WHAT'S NEW    MEMBERSHIP ROSTER    HOSTING A MEETING    EMPLOYMENT
   MONITORING TOOLS    RESOURCES    RELATED LINKS    TABLE OF CONTENTS
     

San Luis Obispo Minutes

Fall 2000, October 19-20, 2000
San Luis Obispo Private Industry Council

October 19, 2000

Introductions:  
Dedre Ahl noted that there were some new faces in the group and requested that everyone stand and introduce themselves.  She then thanked Lee Ferrero, President and CEO, of the San Luis Obispo PIC for arranging our meeting and facilities.  The group also extended a big thank you, to Brenda Rodriguez, our CMN Web Mistress.

Lee Ferrero conducted a review of the history of workforce programs entitled  – “Putting Things in Perspective: The Evolution of Workforce Programs”.  
(Handouts “A Brief History of Workforce Development in the US”) 

 He gave us a task list for surviving WIA –

Agree that things will not start smoothly
Focus on tasks
Learn by doing
Make it through the first year
After you figure out where you are then think about strategic planing
Take it easy.
 

Lee also gave some pointers that our new WIB’s might want to consider –

Let policy follow priorities.
Stay above the fray, and avoid taking ownership of programs.

The presentation contained some very interesting overheads and charts which will be scanned and posted on the Network web site at: http://www.welcome.to/camonet

Vinz Koller – Social Policy Research Associates

Mr. Koller has been working with SPRA to identify effective practices of the early implementation states.  He shared  some of these with the group.

SPRA has a web site at http://www.spra.com where workforce data is compiled and presented.  He suggested that it would be good to keep some of the following points in mind as we begin to monitor the one-stop system.

Ask, “How can we improve monitoring?”:

Make It Non-adversarial
Be Constructive – in attitude and substance
Deliver Technical Assistance – creates a better atmosphere
Be Complementary – have good finding as opposed to negative
Keep The Provider Informed – give a heads up on content    
Don’t Make It Punitive – call findings recommendations, make suggestions for improvement.
Pull the contractor into the solution by asking, “How will/would you fix it?”.

Monitoring One-Stop Centers

Challenges:    

  • What do we monitor under WIA? – Since we are unsure of Federal, State, or local policy!

  • We have experienced a paradigm shift now that we have partners in the one-stop system. 

  • There are no contracts with partners, therefore we have no authority over them.  In addition, we are largely unfamiliar with their programs.

  • Rules are changing and it appears they will continue to change. We must continue to study to stay on top of the information.

  • We may need to help and mentor Service Providers through their fear and confusion.

Identify ways monitors can become “Advocates of Excellence” or “Coaches”

Mr. Koller suggested initiation of a certification procedure for the Center and setting Quality Criteria (i.e., Baldridge)

Monitoring Tools:

Handout Tools.
Chartering and Certification – What criteria entitles 
Are all business decisions driven by the customer.  The emphasis is on customer satisfaction.
Verify that the criteria and process continue to be executed.  (See North Carolina example.)
Self Assessment tool – Wisconsin
Compliance tool – Kentucky
            Covers Rapid Response
            OJTs 
Kern, Inyo, Mono
            Included partners in developing CARP review (generic evaluation tool) narrowing down to elements  essential to a one-stops.
            Process in development.
            Staff does desk review
            Meet with one-stop site supervisors
            Not into fiscal since financial matters are simply based on space allocation. 

Findings from early implementers

Analysis of the early implementers has revealed the following (There is a handout detailing the findings.):

Missing required partners – Florida 

It has been hard to find quantitative data to evaluate.  Most information is qualitative, “soft” stuff, or systemic.  In fact, many areas have spent more time focusing on the processes and watching the numbers after the fact.  The numbers do tend to take care of themselves in a continuous improvement atmosphere.

Vinz recommended reading the “Pennsylvania Business Plan & Criteria” as a way to develop a sense of what we should be looking for as monitors.  The Plan can be viewed on Pennsylvania's web site at www.paworkforce.state.pa.us.

Another source for continuous improvement training is “Partnering for Quality under WIA”  at www.usworkforce.org.  He noted that California has adapted this for local use.  The CWA is also a source of information.

Linking Monitoring to the continuous Improvement Process.

Some areas have established continuous improvement teams.  Anaheim and Merced have linked continuous improvement and monitoring.  It is important to identify what is important to the customer, especially if we don’t do it well, and learn to provide that service to the customer’s satisfaction.

Customer Window:

In order to prioritize the improvement process.  If you do some thing “not well” but your customer “likes” it, it behooves you to learn to do it well.  Result:  Continuous improvement.

For more information you can contact Vinz Koller at:  vinz_koller@spra.com.  

Note:  Vinz’ e-mail motto:  “It is not the most intelligent of a species which survives; it is the most adaptive.”  Darwin.

CMN Business meeting:

Dedre gave out the California Monitor’s Network Web Site Address:  http://welcome.to/camonet

The first term of the officers of the network has concluded.  Each of the nominees are running for office unopposed as follows:

President:  Dedre Ahl, Kern, Inyo, Mono
Vice President:  Rick Gonzalez, Long Beach
Secretary:  Vyvian M. Timm, Tulare County 

The slate of officers was unanimously approved.

By-Laws:  Amendments

LA County Prime Agencies, are now Regional Workforce Groups and it is so reflected in the amended by-laws.

Dedre proposed having meetings twice a year instead of three times.  So many local areas are in a state of flux that it is difficult get away for meetings.  It was suggested that the length of meetings be only one day instead of one and a half.  It was suggested that they be held in the Fall and the Spring.

Two-thirds of the membership present must agree in order change the By-Laws.  Adopted unanimously.

What’s Happening?

Dedre requested the group pole their directors regarding holding the next meeting.  Tulare has volunteered for the Spring meeting, but will defer to another local area should their administration approve a meeting for the group.

Tour of the Creekside Career Center afternoon of the 19th.

Thank you to Lee Ferrero and his kind staff for a very informative tour of the Creekside Career Center.

 

October 20, 2000

Tim Rainey, CWA  

Commenting on Lee Ferrero’s presentation of the previous day, Tim pointed out that you can’t just simply toss out the old – you build on the foundation of the previous layers.  It is very apparent that employment and training has a very rich history on which to develop and refine WIA.

Tim suggested that Boards remain engaged for larger projects and for the long haul, if they can be involved in short term projects with an immediately identifiable result.  He handed out copies of a Survey and Analysis conducted at the Meeting of the Minds in Monterey.  It is also posted at CWA’s web site:  www.calworkforce.org. Once on the CWA web site most people go directly to the “What’s New” section where news articles related to the workforce are posted.  The newest tool on the site is “Research-a-Rama”.  It is of great help because it can index information by the 200 most reliable/valuable websites regarding workforce policy issues.

Tim gave a brief overview of the history of the State Board and actions of the Governor.  He informed us that CWA has sent suggestions to State for use of the 15% Governor’s Discretionary funds.

Invest in one-stop system.
Invest in training for incumbent workers.
Use as seed money for ideas at the local level.

Tim noted that the State is talking about “branding” the one-stop system.  At EDD they are talking about standardizing public information spots.  In fact, the State is convening a work group. He also noted that the federal government is in the same frame of mind.  It appears that both levels of government want to establish an emotional attachment to the one-stop system akin to the “Harley-Davidson” concept. 

Dedre thanked Tim and pointed out that the CMN web page has links to CWA and some of the other sites mentioned by Tim.

Monitoring Tools and Group Discussion

Several local areas brought copies of their one-stop monitoring tools to share with the group.  It was greatly appreciated.

The meeting adjourned at 11:15 A.M.

 
    

Credits:

 Webmaster:
Brenda Rodriguez
 Content:
Dedre Ahl
 Questions:
Brenda Rodriguez